Reason Synths – Quick Comparison

Propellerheads Reason was launched in 2000 off the back of the ReBirth studio. Reason gained a strong following and has built on that over the years. While some rant about lack of VST integration, many die-hard users (like myself) have been happier not to have the clutter that VST brings. In a closed environment, Reason’s stock synths had to be good as they were it.

Let’s take a quick look at each of them from a perspective of 14 years. The Reason synths cover some of the same ground but each has its place and can do some very nice things.

Subtractor

Subtractor is where we all came in and is easily overlooked now as people assume it is a relic from the past when soft synths weren’t as good (by dint of being old – yet not analog – huh!). But that is a mistake as it is a powerful workhorse with a supremely useful filter; the fact it maintains full force even under strong resonance makes it unique in the rack and of course a go-to for acid games.

Subtractor

Subtractor

While the architecture is fixed Sub has enough tricks up its sleeve like the Phase offset system, Ring Modulation, FM and an adaptable Noise Source to be able to do a lot of clever things. And of course there are also all the extra Waveforms (32 in total) on offer too. Inside of a Combinator Sub is wonder for making layers to form a greater ROMpler style of synthesis (minus the samples of course).

Great for: as well as being a cool 90’s style VA (Virtual Analog) capable of harder edged VA sounds, Sub is a great place to start for 80’s style Jupiter/Juno DCO/Analog sounds like brasses, basses and pads.

Thor

The almighty Thor was a later addition but as a pure synth it is one of the finest, and most powerful synths in any format hard or soft. The word Polysonic seems like marketing hype but in fact is apt as Thor can be turned emulate to just about any style of synthesis (bar Physical Modelling but who cares as so far that has been a bit of a bust anyway).

Thor

Thor

Thor can overwhelm beginners which is a shame but that is really due to user fear as the semi-modular nature of Thor is about the most logical set-up of any of the similar “beast” synths (Zebra, z3ta, Ultra Analog, Predator…).

Thor is based on modules that can be swapped and a semi-fixed routing (that can be bypassed) with a superb Modulation Matrix that allows almost anything to modulate (and be scaled by) anything else. This is really where the power of Thor lies. Get your head around the routing (which is really just like making ditches for water to flow along) and suddenly you have not only an amazingly complex (in a good way) instrument but a set of CV (Control Voltage) generators and processors to make a Eurorack owner jealous.

The three OSC slots offer Analog OSC, Yamaha DX FM, Casio CZ PD, PPG Wavetable, a Unison Multi, and a versatile Noise source. The three Filter slots offer Moog Ladder, SEM Multi-Mode, Comb, and Formant options. Because of the thought put into the options plus ability to chain and control the possibilities are amazing.

More important though is the the sound and Thor can really deliver (almost) any sound you can imagine.

Great for: huge basses (PD is great here), immense strings and pads (Analog or Multi-OSC), clinical FM (you don’t need me to spell this out but don’t overlook the PD option), or cold PPG wastescapes (Wavetable and Nosie). Of course if you ever wished you had a Moog or Roland Modular like the back of a Tomita or TONTO record then Thor is your hammer. Oh and Audio can be wired right into wherever you want too so Thor is also a superb mangler. The FX are quite nice too.

Malstrom

I’ll admit to never fully warming to Malstrom but it is a fascinating synth with a lot of possibilities; from the immensely variable Graintable Oscillators (oh how I wish it was possible to grainify your own samples) to the dual Filter/Shaper set-up that is capable of some really gnarly stuff.

Malstrom

Malstrom

What I mostly use Mal for is those filters because you can route audio in and create some edgy, chewed, or crystallized textures.

I do need to remember that even though most of the samples don’t grab me they are meant to be abused and that is Mal’s strength. What it does have though are “basic” waveforms that are in fact multi-OSC Saw and Square sample sets that are immediately useful for basses, strings etc.

Great for: odd sounds, evolving pads, textures, chunky basses, wubbery

Kong

To me Kong is a Drum Synth far more than anything else. Kong comes with many pre-made modules set up for Kicks, Snares, Toms etc with Analog and Physical Models on offer. There is also a specialized version of the NN sampler which I must admit I haven’t really learned and the REX player I haven’t even used. These are actually really good but I far prefer the DIY route of the lower level extra modules. Kong also offers a set of processing tools and effects tailored for drums and they are on the whole (the reverb rarely floats my boat) really useful for adding, subtracting and squishing.

Kong

Kong

Tone & Noise Modules

Tone & Noise Modules

I mostly use the Tone & Noise OSC and from there build my own sounds from scratch. The breadth of possibility is vast as you can add extra pads with more generators for really detailed sounds. So next time you want a TR-606/808/909 type sound, don’t be boring and go seeking samples but make your own right there in the rack with perfect tuning etc for your track.

I’d like to see the option of a dedicated percussion synth that has about 8 of these low level Tone/Noise/FX modules in a row (kinda like the – now no longer – failed OchenK EDs06 RE and Rob Papen’s PunchBD-RE) to get around the limits of the Pad interface and allow really detailed sound sculpting.

Great for: drum roll… yes seriously it’s a drum synth!

NN-19

Paul Hardcastle joke aside the little old NN sampler is a pretty cool little synth in his own right and still deserves a place in the rack in his own right even after 14 years. All the usual things for the day of Sample > Filter and an LFO don’t seem exciting these days but NN-19 did it nicely and it sounds good too.

NN-19

NN-19

To this day I like to use NN-19 for simple synth sounds from my own waves; great in Combinators for creating layers. The other thing is that most of Mr 19’s parameters can be automatized (spell checker likes this word and I think I do too) so if you are making chop-step then this is the tool for you.

Great for: simple or Combi-layered sample synthesis and hyper-edit sample mangling

NN-XT

NN-XT is still one of the most useable sample player synths around. Sure it doesn’t have the wizardry of NI’s Komplete sampler under the hood but for layering samples and creating your own Roland/Korg ROMpler or complex synths then the XT in the name is well placed.

NN-XT

NN-XT

The only downside (and it has to be this way or the universe would explode) is the lack of ability to do much in the way of automation past the knobs along the top. However in use this is rarely a problem (if it is then see the NN-19 above).

Being me I don’t really use uber-sampled pianos or strings but lots of simple OSC waves and the editing is detailed enough to make some really cool, huge sounds for just about anything.

Great for: lots and lots of samples layered up and parameterized (ok so I made that word up) to the NNth degree.

So which do I learn?

Most people will be better starting with Subtractor because of its fixed architecture. NN-19 would apply here too so long as you use just simple OSC waves and avoid complex samples. Sadly many people are scared by Thor’s Mod Matrix and feel that they are done in before they even try. This is a crying shame as Thor is just a joy of a instrument to work with and can be as easy or complex as you want it to be.

Whichever you choose though get to know it. Get to know it well. Like it’s the person you want to spend the rest of your life with – assumptions always lead to unhappiness.

The most common mistake I see people making is not seeing the signal flow in their head. Signal flow is just (as I pointed to above) like water flowing down channels. If the gate is open then the water flows, if it isn’t then the plants don’t grow. If it helps, draw signal flows on paper till you get the concept of how your finger on a key = the sound you hear. For a while it may steal some of the magic but that will come back in a richer way as you see yourself better able to realize your dream of music.

And stick with it. Don’t go trying to find a better, easier, more suited to the hip sound of today tool (toy) as then you won’t master anything (except parting with money and getting stressed).

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s